
Ampex ATR 124
Ampex
USA

Tape Deck Details
Number of Motors
Number of Heads
Head Configuration
Wow & Flutter
Signal-to-Noise [dB]
Dimensions [mm]
Weight [kg]
Year built
Head Composition
Equalization
Frequency Response
Speed
7½, 15, 30
Max Reel [inch]
Tracks
$62500
1/4 Rec/PB
Price
Additional Information
The ATR-124 was introduced by Ampex in 1979 as its most advanced 24-track machine, using 2-inch tape width.
According to sources, only around 50-70 units were ever made (some say 62) due to its very high price and niche market.
It is regarded by many in the pro-audio world as one of the finest sounding analog multitrack tape machines ever built.
Despite its quality, the machine’s high cost and the rise of digital recording led to limited commercial success; by 1983 Ampex exited the professional audio tape-recorder market.
The ATR-124 uses a 2″ wide tape (standard for 24-track analog multitrack) along with large reels (studio size) and robust transport mechanics.
Tape motion: Controlled by capstan servo for speed/direction, and reel servo for tape tension and reel drive; no conventional pinch-roller mechanism is used in the usual consumer sense. The transport uses a capstan + servo design.
The machine supports multiple tape speeds (noted below) which allow flexibility for differing fidelity versus recording time trade-offs.
The machine is physically large, heavy, and required professional installation, cooling (forced-air ventilation) and maintenance due to its complexity.
Channels: Up to 24 tracks for audio recording/reproduction in the flagship model.
Selective Synchronization (Sel-Sync): Enables recording on one or more tracks while simultaneously monitoring other previously recorded tracks. This is critical for overdubbing in a multitrack studio.
Operational features include:
Tape timer (displaying hours/minutes/seconds from zero reference).
Search-to-Cue: Automatic access to a pre-programmed point on the tape for editing.
PURC (Pick-Up Recording Capability): Helps prevent overlaps or “holes” when inserting new material into an already recorded program.
Dynamic braking: Instead of mechanical brakes, the machine uses dynamic electrical braking to stop tape motion, including in power-off conditions.
Modular construction: The recorder consists of major assemblies (transport, head assembly, audio electronics, control assemblies, power supply, meter panel, I/O panel) with multipin connectors for easier removal/servicing.
While full technical specifications (frequency response curves, noise, crosstalk, tape width, weight) are not all publicly detailed in the sources I found, here are the key spec items:
Tape speeds: 7.5 in/s, 15 in/s, 30 in/s (inches per second).
Channel count: Up to 24 tracks in the 2″ format. (Some variant references also mention 16 track versions)
Build quality: Very ruggedly constructed with audio specs that “nearly rivalled the first digital recording machines”.
Original price: In 1980-era dollars, roughly US$62,500 for the 24-track machine.
Because only a small number were built, parts availability for the ATR-124 is limited. One user’s comment:
“While arguably the best sounding machine ever built, the maintenance is over the top. … if you don’t have a second parts machine, then you’re pretty much screwed at this point…”Technicians reported that the machine, while superb, demanded significant time and commitment to keep running, especially if used heavily in a studio environment.
The rarity, prestige and performance of the ATR-124 make it desirable for vintage studios, tape-to-digital archiving, and for engineers seeking the “classic analog tape sound”.
For modern use, planning for maintenance, head alignment, transport adjustment, tape path cleaning, and access to service documentation/manuals is crucial. The complexity of such a machine is significantly higher than consumer tape decks.
The Ampex ATR-124 stands as one of the ultimate analog multitrack tape machines: 2″ tape, up to 24 tracks, multiple speeds, professional features (Sel-Sync, PURC, search-to-cue), and superb build and audio quality. Its rarity, cost and maintenance demands mean it's more a studio legacy piece than a casual machine. If you're looking into operating or acquiring one, it is excellent—but you must be prepared for the infrastructure, service support, and space/power requirements.